Positioning

To better understand where Flashback fits in the cloud ecosystem, here’s a breakdown of the three major cloud solution categories that exist today.

---

🏛️ Centralized Cloud Providers

Centralized cloud providers offer on-demand storage resources. They own and operate massive data centers worldwide, allowing businesses to deploy and scale applications globally.

✅ Pros	❌ Cons
High performance and reliability	Vendor lock-in & high costs
Fully managed services with automation	Data privacy concerns (government access, regulatory issues)
Strong enterprise security and compliance	Limited interoperability between providers

---

🕸️ Decentralized Cloud Providers

Decentralized cloud solutions operate peer-to-peer, using blockchain to distribute storage tasks across independent nodes. Instead of a single entity owning the infrastructure, individual participants rent out computing/storage resources.

✅ Pros	❌ Cons
Privacy-first and censorship-resistant	Typically slow and unreliable to scale
Lower costs due to marketplace-driven pricing	Less mature ecosystem than centralized clouds
No single point of failure	Limited enterprise adoption

---

⛅ Multi-Cloud Orchestrators

Multi-cloud orchestrators abstract cloud infrastructure by allowing organizations to deploy workloads across multiple cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.). These tools optimize cost, redundancy, and scalability without vendor lock-in.

✅ Pros	❌Cons
Flexibility to run applications on different cloud providers	Still relies on centralized cloud providers
Avoid vendor lock-in and optimize cloud costs	Can be complex to implement and manage
Hybrid and multi-cloud management with automation	Cost savings depend on workload and provider pricing

---

⚡Flashback – Decentralized Multi-Cloud Platform

Flashback is a decentralized multi-cloud platform that orchestrates peer-to-peer bridge storage with centralized and decentralized Cloud providers.

Comparative Table

Feature	Centralized Providers	Decentralized Providers	Multi-Cloud Orchestrators	Flashback
Infrastructure Ownership	Fully owned by a single entity	Peer-to-peer network of independent providers	Uses resources from multiple centralized providers	Uses resources from multiple centralized and decentralized providers
Decentralization	❌ No – Fully centralized	✅ Yes – Peer-to-peer, no single authority	⚠️ Partial – Uses centralized providers but avoids lock-in	✅ Yes – Trustless & multi-ecosystem governance
Scalability & Flexibility	✅ High – Auto-scaling, global data centers	⚠️ Moderate – Limited by validator network	✅ High – Can run across major centralized providers	✅ High – Multi-cloud policies with seamless connection
Data Control & Privacy	❌ Limited – Data controlled by provider	✅ High – Users control encryption and storage	⚠️ Moderate – Depends on provider policies	✅ High – AI-driven recommendations and manual settings for full control over encryption and storage
Cost & Pricing Model	❌ Expensive – Fixed pricing & egress fees	✅ Competitive – Market-driven pricing	⚠️ Varies – Can optimize costs across clouds	✅ Dynamic pricing – Optimized based on user' need and usage, and marketplace pricing

---

Comparison of Top Multi-Cloud Orchestrators with Flashback

This table evaluates Flashback against leading multi-cloud orchestrators and includes Google Cloud (as a centralized cloud provider) and Filecoin (as a decentralized storage provider) for reference as non-multi-cloud providers. It gives here the positioning of Flashback as a major technological revolution in the Cloud landscape.

---

Comparison of Multi-Cloud Orchestrators with Flashback, Google Cloud, and Filecoin

Solution	Centralized	Decentralized	Web3 Support	Payment	Cost of Use	Integration Cost	Ease of Use	Sales Team Contact
Google Cloud	Google Cloud Only	❌ No	🔶Partially	Pay-as-you-go	💰💰💰 High	💰 Low (Well-known environment by engineers)	✅High	✅ Unlikely
Filecoin	❌ No	Filecoin Network Only	✅ Yes	Immutable Provision	💰 Very Low	💰💰💰 High (Storage & Blockchain knowledge required)	❌Low	❌Likely
Snowflake	AWS, Azure, Google Cloud	❌ No	❌ No	Pay-as-you-go	💰💰 Medium	💰💰 Medium (Requires data engineering and cloud integration expertise)	✅High	✅ Unlikely
Google Anthos	AWS, Azure, GCP, On-Prem	❌ No	❌ No	Pay-as-you-go	💰💰💰High	💰💰💰 High (Requires strong expertise in cloud management)	🔶Medium	❌Likely
Red Hat OpenShift	AWS, Azure, GCP, Private Cloud	❌ No	❌ No	Pay-as-you-go	💰💰 Medium	💰💰💰 High (Enterprise integration expertise needed)	✅High	❌ Likely
HashiCorp Terraform	AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle Cloud	❌ No	❌ No	Pay-as-you-go	💰 Low	💰 💰 Medium (Infrastructure as code expertise needed)	✅High	✅ Unlikely
VMware Tanzu	AWS, Azure, GCP, Private Data Centers	❌ No	❌ No	Pay-as-you-go	💰💰💰 High	💰💰💰 High (Requires knowledge of VMware ecosystem known by few engineers)	🔶Medium	❌Likely
Flashback	AWS, Azure, GCP, OVH, Alibaba, On-Prem, and more	Filecoin, Storj, Züs and more	✅ Yes	Flexible and mutable Provision as you need	💰💰 Medium	💰 Low (Use techs well-known by engineers)	✅ High	✅ Unlikely

---

🚀 Why Flashback Stands Out

Flashback is the world's first agentic cloud diversification platform.

✅ Decentralized & trustless: Use the power of smart contract technologies to support transparent and auditable storage. ✅ Multi-cloud optimized: Enables hybrid storage across centralized and decentralized clouds with a unique orchestration system developed for leveraging the best of both worlds. ✅ Agentic AI: Unique platform integrating Agentic AI to optimize the costs and resource allocation with the marketplace and tools of the platform. ✅ Cost efficiency: Balances storage cost vs. retrieval speed dynamically according to the providers or nodes' performances of DePin technologies;

Unlike AWS, Azure, and GCP, it eliminates vendor lock-in and enables provable storage.

Unlike Akash, Filecoin, and Flux, it integrates multi-cloud orchestration, ensuring optimized performance while maintaining decentralization.

Unlike Anthos, OpenShift, and Terraform, it doesn’t rely only on centralized cloud providers but rather balances between decentralized and centalized environments.